WHY
GHOSTS MUST BE SCARY: A WRITER’S LESSON
By
G. W. Thomas

Ghosts,
as a monster of interest to horror fans, have fallen on hard times. Films, cartoons
and comic books like Casper the Friendly Ghost and Ghostbusters
play up the comedic angles of ethereal spirits. The Ring (2003) was a huge
success as a horror film because its creator remembered something we have all
forgotten after our endless white-sheet ghosts: ghosts must
be scary.
The
idea of the transparent version of a human soul, that looks and acts like its
corporal self, dates back to ancient times. The Greeks peopled their underworld
with such specters. Were they scary? Not really, nor were they meant to be. Such
tales of Hades and Tartarus are more symbolic or mythological. They were never
meant to be ghost stories per se.
The
Ghost Story, as we know it, is a product of the 19th Century. Less than a century
earlier, the Gothic writers like Horace Walpole and Ann Radcliffe, produced thrills
with ghosts that usually turned out to be badly explained frauds, a lost heir
or trapped former wife. We know this formula best today from cartoons like Scooby
Doo.
The
Victorians who followed the Gothic writers, pioneers like Ainsworth, Le Fanu and,
of course, Dickens, shaped the ghost story into a tale in which real supernatural
events affect the lives of ordinary people. Magazines published ghost stories
by the ream. Many of these stories have become the staid clichés, even
in Dickens’ own time, as evidenced by Dickens’ complaints in “Christmas Ghosts”
(1850).
The classics
Victorian ghost stories are those that still create a delicious shiver of dread
even today, despite being set in a world of lace collars, train stations and upstairs
maids. A good ghost story touches that which is human in all of us. Turning the
trick must be more than just “…and he disappeared.” Such clunkers were hoary with
age in Roman times, when Pliny the Younger used it in his “Letter to Sula”.
So
what makes a ghost scary? As with the film, The Ring, it always comes down
to how well the artist can convey the sheer malevolence of the dead spirit. The
ghost may have special powers or none at all, but it must have an unending hatred
(Oscar Wilde’s “Canterville Ghost” begins nasty enough but ends up just another
friend of the family. This is fine for a fantasy like Frank R. Stockton’s “The
Great Staircase at Landover Hall”, where a man falls in love with a ghost but
it is not a “ghost story”. ) Mere physical harm alone is not enough. We don’t
recoil from a rattlesnake except out of physical fright. We know its poison and
speed make it deadly but it doesn’t fill us with dread. There is something missing,
an intelligence bent upon our destruction. The snake is operating on instinct
alone, and would like to avoid you as much as you it.
The
ghost story writer has a few tricks to show this all-important evil to the reader.
I will outline these with examples from classic ghost stories.
Persistent.
Scary ghosts never give up. You can’t run
away. The ghost-like vampire in “The Horla” by Guy de Maupassant follows its victim
from house to house until he goes mad and tries to burn the house down, ghost
and all. Like a guilty conscience, scary ghosts will follow you forever. The matronly
ghost from Elizabeth Gaskell’s “The Old Nurse’s Story” will always be waiting
for some unsuspecting child to be left alone.
Unbendable.
Scary ghost will never negotiate, or if they do, their price is too high to consider.
How can you debate with the terror that dwells inside Shirley Jackson’s The
Haunting of Hill House? The forces loose in that house are massive like an
earthquake. You might as well try and argue with a tornado or a volcano. The Robert
Wise film version was scarier than the remake with Liam Neeson because the forces
remain unseen and therefore negotiation is impossible.
Unstoppable.
Scary ghosts have amazing power. They can wait for centuries. They can come back
again and again. The ghostly ancestor who dwells in the “The Secret Chamber” by
Margaret Oliphant, will have his way. His progeny can try to defy him but in the
end, he will be victorious. It is this knowledge of invincibility that makes him
so repulsive. Fickle lovers experience the determination of the dead in Rudyard
Kipling’s “The Phantom Rickshaw” and Mary E. Braddon’s “The Cold Embrace”.
Insidious. Scary
ghosts will use everything and anything to get at you. They can look like your
mother or your daughter. The ghostly lothario, in “Eveline’s Visitant” by Mary
E. Braddon, can’t win the husband’s ailing wife away in life but he knows he can
in death. In many Japanese ghost stories, some of the very best, the ghosts may
not appear harmful until aroused as with the specters in “Hoichi, the Earless”
by Lafcadio Hearn. A wise man must tell Hoichi he is consorting with spirits,
and that mystic symbols are needed to ward them off. Unfortunately the wiseman
forgets Hoichi’s ears. The title tells what happens next.
Unfathomable.
Lovecraft pointed out that the greatest fear is fear of the unknown. A sense of
mystery is essential to a great ghost. If we understand all there is to know about
a ghost it loses some of its creepiness. M. R. James was the master of suggesting
ghosts, giving very little but producing such terrible specters. My favorite is
the hairy ghost-creature from “Canon Alberic’s Scrapbook”. This apparition appears
to whomever owns the scrapbook. Joseph Le Fanu does a similar thing in “The Watcher”
and F. Marion Crawford in “The Upper Berth” where the ghost is felt before it
is seen. If the writer does not suggest enough the effect may not work, as in
the novel-length The Girl in a Swing by Richard Adams.
A
few more caveats:
1)
Avoid logical explanations. The old Scooby Doo ending
is acceptable, maybe, in some children’s publishing, but nowhere else. The writer
might hint at why a ghost does what it does but to reveal it was “only Mr. Dingwall
the Principal in a rubber mask” is like frosting a birthday cake with garden slugs.
You build a beautiful, scary structure then ruin it.
2)
Avoid humor. Ghost stories are somber things. Humorous
ghost stories, such as those collected in Robertson Davies’ High Spirits
are fun but not the same animal. Black humor stories such as the works of Robert
Bloch can work in a horror tale but not a ghost story.
3)
Avoid sentiment. Ghosts should not become likeable
in the end. A good example of this is “How Fear Left the Long Gallery” by E. F.
Benson. In the first part of the tale the twin ghosts are scary as hell but by
making the ending warm-and-fuzzy the story loses momentum. Another one that creates
no fire at all is Kipling’s “They” in which a man finds an old plantation where
children’s spirits live. To make the film version scary the writers had to introduce
a scary owl-like ghost. Kipling wrote the story after his daughter’s death, making
it cathartic for himself rather than scary for us.
4)
Avoid the soapbox. A political or sociological dissertation
hidden in a ghost story was acceptable in Dickens’ time, but it’s death today.
His story "The Last Words of the Old Year" is a rant disguised as a story and
dull except to political science students. Ghosts have their own agenda. Stick
with that. Your job is to scare people.
5)
Avoid the cliché. This includes white figures
with chains and a hundred other Dickenian clichés. Make your ghost memorable
in some way. Don’t be afraid to make your ghosts modern too. The girl in The
Ring used videotape. The spirits in Poltergeist came through the television.
Ghosts are not always ancient creatures bound to the past. They can be a minute
old or even from the future.
Originally
published in WHISPERING SPIRITS